Contact us at (866) 265-5575 or sales@realhealthdata.com

Underestimated prevalence of heart failure in hospital inpatients: a comparison of ICD codes and discharge letter information.

Underestimated prevalence of heart failure in hospital inpatients: a comparison of ICD codes and discharge letter information.

Read the original article.

Kaspar M1,2,┬ Fette G1,2,┬ G├╝der G1,┬ Seidlmayer L1,┬ Ertl M2,3,┬ Dietrich G2,┬ Greger H3,┬ Puppe F2,┬ St├Ârk S4.

Author information

  1. Comprehensive Heart Failure Center (CHFC), Department of Internal Medicine I, W├╝rzburg University Hospital, Am Schwarzenberg 15, 97078, W├╝rzburg, Germany.
  2. Chair of Computer Science VI, University of W├╝rzburg, W├╝rzburg, Germany.
  3. Service Center Medical Informatics, W├╝rzburg University Hospital, W├╝rzburg, Germany.
  4. Comprehensive Heart Failure Center (CHFC), Department of Internal Medicine I, W├╝rzburg University Hospital, Am Schwarzenberg 15, 97078, W├╝rzburg, Germany. Stoerk_S@ukw.de.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Heart failure is the predominant cause of hospitalization and amongst the leading causes of death in Germany. However, accurate estimates of prevalence and incidence are lacking. Reported figures originating from different information sources are compromised by factors like economic reasons or documentation quality.

METHODS:

We implemented a clinical data warehouse that integrates various information sources (structured parameters, plain text, data extracted by natural language processing) and enables reliable approximations to the real number of heart failure patients. Performance of ICD-based diagnosis in detecting heart failure was compared across the years 2000-2015 with (a) advanced definitions based on algorithms that integrate various sources of the hospital information system, and (b) a physician-based reference standard.

RESULTS:

Applying these methods for detecting heart failure in inpatients revealed that relying on ICD codes resulted in a marked underestimation of the true prevalence of heart failure, ranging from 44% in the validation dataset to 55% (single year) and 31% (all years) in the overall analysis. Percentages changed over the years, indicating secular changes in coding practice and efficiency. Performance was markedly improved using search and permutation algorithms from the initial expert-specified query (F1 score of 81%) to the computer-optimized query (F1 score of 86%) or, alternatively, optimizing precision or sensitivity depending on the search objective.

CONCLUSIONS:

Estimating prevalence of heart failure using ICD codes as the sole data source yielded unreliable results. Diagnostic accuracy was markedly improved using dedicated search algorithms. Our approach may be transferred to other hospital information systems.

KEYWORDS:

Data warehouse; Electronic health records; Heart failure; ICD coding; Information extraction

PMID: 29667017
PMCID: PMC6105250
DOI: 10.1007/s00392-018-1245-z
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article